Results based on laboratory and animal model data
Provides higher concentration of adipose graft tissue1
Consistently improves graft quality and provides predictable results
Concentration Of Adipose Graft Tissue
In a laboratory study, fat processed using 3 different methods was evaluated for adipose tissue concentration, pH, osmolality, hematocrit assays, and percent of oil and aqueous content.
REVOLVE™ System yielded a higher concentration of adipose tissue, eliminating free oil and significantly reducing aqueous fluid and red blood cell debris.
COMPOSITION OF PROCESSED TISSUE1*
evidence9
*Correlation between these results and results in humans has not been established.
More reliable fat graft retention
In an animal model, REVOLVE™ System yielded significantly higher fat graft retention than decantation and similar results to centrifugation1*
PERCENT OF IMPLANTED FAT RETAINED
evidence10
*Correlation between these results and results in humans has not been established.
In a preclinical study, human fat was processed using 3 different methods: REVOLVE™ System, decantation, and centrifugation (processed at 1200 g for 3 minutes). Fat samples from each group were implanted into mice and explanted after 28 days and evaluated for a head-to-head comparison of volume retention.
TIME SAVINGS
Higher volumes of fat injected in less time
REVOLVE™ System processed higher volume of fat in less time, significantly reducing operating room (OR) time compared to centrifugation2
IMPROVED OPERATIVE OUTCOMES WITH USE OF
REVOLVE SYSTEM VS CENTRIFUGATION
evidence11

A retrospective study reviewed 96 patients with fat grafts processed by centrifugation and 98 patients with fat grafts processed by REVOLVE™ System. The endpoints measured included volume injected after processing and time to complete (from lipoaspiration to fat injection); grafting rate reflects volume of fat injected over the time taken to complete procedure. In this study, REVOLVE™ System processed more fat per minute than centrifugation, decreasing operating time and potential OR costs.
REDUCED FAT GRAFTING COMPLICATIONS
Lower nodule and cyst formation, fewer reoperations within 6 months of the first fat grafting procedure
Compared to centrifugation, REVOLVE™ System resulted in significantly lower nodule and cyst formation, and significantly fewer reoperations to add more soft tissue within 6 months of the first fat grafting procedure.2†
FEWER COMPLICATIONS WITH REVOLVE™ SYSTEM VS CENTRIFUGATION
table-xs
Controlled for age, body mass index, and prior chemotherapy exposure.
The study was a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent autologous fat grafting during reconstructive breast surgery with REVOLVE™ System or centrifugation. The endpoints measured included proportion of patients undergoing reoperation and complication rates for each group during the 6 months following the fat grafting procedure.